Wrap <cit> contents in <quote>

[Fortune] / data / NAFUS_Dawn__2011__PatchesGender / fortunes / DownrightFreedFromIt

diff --git a/data/NAFUS_Dawn__2011__PatchesGender/fortunes/DownrightFreedFromIt b/data/NAFUS_Dawn__2011__PatchesGender/fortunes/DownrightFreedFromIt
index d834102795099533d69d30c8c3a0f025b91cf6b6..7cc219c383007e23fd26b4d23929993d91ffda24 100644 (file)
--- a/data/NAFUS_Dawn__2011__PatchesGender/fortunes/DownrightFreedFromIt
+++ b/data/NAFUS_Dawn__2011__PatchesGender/fortunes/DownrightFreedFromIt
@@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
 <?xml version="1.0"?>
 <!DOCTYPE cit SYSTEM "../../../DTD">
 <cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
 <?xml version="1.0"?>
 <!DOCTYPE cit SYSTEM "../../../DTD">
 <cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">

-       <p>
-               In <abbr>F/LOSS</abbr>, openness relies on a steadfastly closed epistemological frame that not only constitutes technology as apart from persons, but shapes this separability in such a way that code is more than just outside the realm of the social: it is <seg type="callout">downright <emph>freed</emph> from it</seg><pc unit="sentence">.</pc>
-               The social here is not exactly orthogonal to the technical as <abbr>F/LOSS</abbr> imagination has it; rather, social forms shape how ties are <emph>severed</emph>, as well as how they are built, between people<pc unit="sentence">.</pc>
-               Not needing to know with whom code is being exchanged, or having a stake in their concerns, is as central to <abbr>F/LOSS</abbr> as open scrutiny to improve code quality<pc unit="sentence">.</pc>
-       </p>
+       <quote>
+               <p>
+                       In <abbr>F/LOSS</abbr>, openness relies on a steadfastly closed epistemological frame that not only constitutes technology as apart from persons, but shapes this separability in such a way that code is more than just outside the realm of the social: it is <seg type="callout">downright <emph>freed</emph> from it</seg><pc unit="sentence">.</pc>
+                       The social here is not exactly orthogonal to the technical as <abbr>F/LOSS</abbr> imagination has it; rather, social forms shape how ties are <emph>severed</emph>, as well as how they are built, between people<pc unit="sentence">.</pc>
+                       Not needing to know with whom code is being exchanged, or having a stake in their concerns, is as central to <abbr>F/LOSS</abbr> as open scrutiny to improve code quality<pc unit="sentence">.</pc>
+               </p>
+       </quote>

        <bibl>
                <citedRange unit="page" from="680" to="680"/>
        </bibl>
        <bibl>
                <citedRange unit="page" from="680" to="680"/>
        </bibl>