X-Git-Url: https://git.ladys.computer/Fortune/blobdiff_plain/67849dd8598e05ce4095f9ff5df6ace13991659f..122e15fc0047ef832eab4ce5f7f1d241a8d003fb:/data/NAFUS_Dawn__2011__PatchesGender/fortunes/LikeASystemOfScience

diff --git a/data/NAFUS_Dawn__2011__PatchesGender/fortunes/LikeASystemOfScience b/data/NAFUS_Dawn__2011__PatchesGender/fortunes/LikeASystemOfScience
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..92ab3ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/NAFUS_Dawn__2011__PatchesGender/fortunes/LikeASystemOfScience
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<?xml version="1.0"?>
+<!DOCTYPE cit SYSTEM "../../../DTD">
+<cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:lang="en">
+	<p>
+		Other researchers have likened software production to craft production<note n="2">
+			<p>
+				Here <abbr>F/LOSS</abbr>ers are drawing on the masculinity of the eighteenth century blacksmith or woodworker, an image that evokes a self‐sufficient individualist without posing a threat to male dominance.
+			</p>
+		</note> (Coleman, 2001) or pleasurable play (Klief and Faulkner, 2002)<pc unit="sentence">.</pc>
+		In our study this is indeed part of coders’ imagination<pc unit="sentence">.</pc>
+		Members often describe their work as ‘scratching an itch’ by producing something tangible and craft‐like<pc unit="sentence">.</pc>
+		Scratching an itch is a common reason why people become involved with communities and why they stay<pc unit="sentence">.</pc>
+		Yet tradition and repetition, key elements of other forms of craft production, have no place other than as building blocks upon which to take one’s own work further<pc unit="sentence">.</pc>
+		Re‐doing work similar to that of other coders does not scratch the itch satisfactorily, whereas it generally does among craftspeople<pc unit="sentence">.</pc>
+		In this way, the craft system looks suspiciously <seg type="callout">like a system of science</seg><pc unit="sentence">.</pc>
+	</p>
+	<bibl>
+		<citedRange unit="page" from="677" to="677"/>
+	</bibl>
+</cit>