F·O·A·F is an early and widely‐used vocabulary which grew some·what organically within the R·D·F·Web community. It is not necessarily weldesigned in all respects, but it has been commonly deployed as a vocabulary for modelling Agents, and is often used alongside (which models the things they make). D·C·M·I and F·O·A·F have a good neighbour agreement formalizing the fact that the two vocabularies often go hand‐in‐hand.

Due to its organically‐developed nature, terms in F·O·A·F were given a status, meant to indicate how stable their definitions ought to be considered. These statuses have not been updated in over a decade, and are not preserved here; however, a status of at least testing was deemed a criterion for inclusion.

Otherwise, this ontology provides definitions for the bulk of F·O·A·F, wilfully excluding the following properties :⁠—

, , and are roundabout terms which indicate Documents which have a primary topic of a thing, rather than just indicating the thing itself. This was a pragmatic choice by the authors of F·O·A·F because it was assumed these documents would have more welknown, and thus easily-queryable, I·R·I¦s. But R·D·F tooling and understanding has significantly matured in the years since these properties were introduced, and they are far from bestpractice now. (Just make a bloody blank node!)

and are properties for identifying the original, not current, owner of an internet mailbox, and thus not useful for the actual sending of messages. Originally, these properties were conceived as a means of determining Agent identity; in the case of , this intent is much better served by just using a tag: U·R·I, which can be email‐derived. is of questionable utility in practice.

is a subclass of Document which is used for R·D·F documents whose primary topic is their maker. But this relationship is more useful stated explicitly (i·e, with properties), and the class offers little.

A number of properties (, , , , , ) are tied to specific online platforms; these are better served by the generic properties surrounding Online Accounts.

, for lack of any strong argument for inclusion.

F·O·A·F also makes use of a single class in the geo: name·space, . This ontology like·wise adopts this term.