<?xml version="1.0"?> <!-- SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2024 Lady <https://www.ladys.computer/about/#lady> SPDX-License-Identifier: CC0-1.0 --> <!DOCTYPE Class SYSTEM "../../DTD"> <Class> <label xml:lang="en">Work</label> <comment xml:lang="en"> <p> An abstract information thing “of value”, “typically intellectual property”. </p> <p> Defining works based on their “value”, and specifically, tying them to the concept of property, is pretty sus, and this class isn¦t exactly recommended. However, it <em>is</em> more general (probably) than <ptr target="foaf:Document"/>, and there are cases (i·e, copyright licensing) where defining some·thing based on the fact that it is a piece of intellectual property might make sense, or at least not be obviously problematic. </p> </comment> <isDefinedBy> <SpecificResource source="(SWAP-PIM)"/> </isDefinedBy> </Class>