<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!--
SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2024 Lady <https://www.ladys.computer/about/#lady>
SPDX-License-Identifier: CC0-1.0
-->
<!DOCTYPE Class SYSTEM "../../DTD">
<Class>
	<label xml:lang="en">Work</label>
	<comment xml:lang="en">
		<p>
			An abstract information thing “of value”, “typically intellectual property”.
		</p>
		<p>
			Defining works based on their “value”, and specifically, tying them to the concept of property, is pretty sus, and this class isn¦t exactly recommended.
			However, it <em>is</em> more general (probably) than <ptr target="foaf:Document"/>, and there are cases (i·e, copyright licensing) where defining some·thing based on the fact that it is a piece of intellectual property might make sense, or at least not be obviously problematic.
		</p>
	</comment>
	<isDefinedBy>
		<SpecificResource source="(SWAP-PIM)"/>
	</isDefinedBy>
</Class>